JEM Football Service

JEM News

Welcome to Your New Job... But Don't Fall in Love With the Neighborhood Just Yet!    posted 2009

   In the waning weeks of each college football season, as conference championships heat up, bowl directors make up their wish lists of teams that would be the best draw and the talk begins about who will play in the BCS title game, there are just as many programs passing out the pink slips. Whether it was too many losses, the need to head in a "new direction" or they couldn't beat their hated rival, there are almost as many programs putting coaches in the unemployment line as there are ones heading for warm weather bowl destinations. Such is life in major college football.

   Last year alone 20 schools replaced their head man. Some retired such as Mike Bellotti (Ore.) and Joe Tiller (Purdue) and some moved on to bigger programs and more lucrative contracts such as Gene Chizik (ISU-AU) and Brady Hoke (BSU-SDSU) but most were unceremoniously canned. At times this could work out well. Nick Saben took Alabama to a bowl win in his first season, finished 12-2 last year and was one quarter of football away from playing for the BCS championship. Although it was mostly a lateral move, Houston Nutt took over a 3-9 Mississippi team and turned it around to finish 9-4 including huge wins over Florida and Texas Tech. Brian Kelly took over an average Cincinnati program that finished 19-17 the three previous years under Mark Dantonio and has compiled a 21-4 record the last 2 years including a Big East title and BCS bowl game.

   However, more often than not, the first couple of years under a new regime can prove difficult especially if new schemes are being introduced on either side of the ball. One of the most glaring examples of this was the Michigan situation last year under first year coach Rich Rodriguez. Trying to implement a new spread offense into a program long known for its power rushing attack proved more arduous than most anticipated and resulted in a 3-9 record, the first losing season in 40 years for the Wolverines. Bill Callahan experienced the same frustrations in Lincoln where the transformation to a wide open attack yielded seasons of 5-6, 8-4, 9-5 and 5-7 before he was fired. Even if a new coach is not introducing dramatic change, adjustment to a new staff can be difficult. I'm sure most fans in Louisville did not envision a 11-13 record the last two years under Steve Kragthorpe after a combined 41-9 record under Bobby Patrino. Although Steve Kragthorp did a remarkable job turning around Tulsa, it is clearly taking a little longer than expected getting the Cardinals back to the top of the Big East.

   Unfortunately time is the one thing most athletic directors and alumni are not willing to provide. Lucrative contracts?...Sure, how would you like that deposited? Stadium renovations and upgraded facilities to wow new recruits?... No problem, when would you like us to break ground? But ask for some patience and your likely response will be... sorry we're fresh out of that one. Out of the 120 head coaches in the FBS, exactly half are in their first 3 years with their program. In fact, job security does not appear to be an option until you reach your ninth season as you could see in the table below.

Number of years with team 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+
Number of coaches 20 19 21 7 15 5 3 5 12 13

   How this years class of freshman head coaches will fare, only time will tell. As we mentioned earlier there are 20 new head coaches scattered across the conferences heading into the '09 season. What most consider the toughest, the SEC, has three. Two of them, Lane Kiffin at Tennessee and Gene Chizik at Auburn will need early success while expectations for Dan Mullen at Mississippi St. will not be as high. Even though the Big XII has two 1st year coaches, only Paul Rhoads at Iowa St. qualifies as calling Bill Snyder a new coach at Kansas St. is like calling Brett Favre a rookie in the NFC North. The conference with the most turnover is the MAC as 5 of the 13 schools introduce new staffs. Brady Hoke was rewarded for his accomplishments at Ball St. with the head spot at SDSU. Toledo said goodbye to Tom Amstutz after 30 years of service when he resigned and former Notre Dame OC Mike Haywood becomes the next in line at the "cradle of coaches", Miami (OH). The Pac 10 has two new faces. Steve Sarkisian heads north from USC to Seattle and will try to return the Huskies to the top and Chip Kelly will try to follow the footsteps of Mike Bellotti who won 116 of 171 games in Eugene. The transition should be a little easier for Chip Kelly as well as Danny Hope (Purdue), Frank Spaziani (Boston College) and Stan Parrish (Ball St.) as all four of these coaches were hired from within. There appears to be less shock to the system when schools choose this course. Bret Bielema was 12-1 SU and 9-3 ATS following the legendary Barry Alverez at Wisconsin. Chris Peterson was Boise St's OC when he replaced Dan Hawkins and has posted a 35-4 SU record since '06. I'm sure hearts were broken in Utah when Urban Meyer left the Utes for the "swamp" in Florida. But their DC, Kyle Wittingham, was given the job and has followed the "Urban legend" nicely with a 37-14 SU record including last years undefeated season and #2 final ranking.

   It is always interesting following new coaches and watching their programs mature and improve. Hopefully this year's freshmen class of coaches will see that improvement at years end and not the dreaded pink slip...!    

    

Home Field....Advantage?    posted 2008

   There is nothing quite like an autumn Saturday. The leaves are falling, the air is fresh and from big cities to small towns across America the sound of drums from university marching bands can be heard. From Doak S. Campbell Stadium in Tallahassee to the Coliseum in Los Angeles, from Tiger Stadium in Baton Rouge to Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, millions of rabid football fans are doing there best to cheer, scream, shout and yes will there team to victory. Visiting teams must feel like they're being fed to the lions. Audibles at the line can't be heard, the student sections are pounding their feet doing the "Tomahawk", the "Gator Chomp", or singing "Rocky Top" for what seems like an eternity. Every mistake and negative play is shown over and over on the jumbotron. So we ask, how much of an impact does home field advantage have not only on the outcome of the game but, more importantly for a handicapper, on the point spread.

   We decided to break down our data in the table below by conference with each conference's overall  home winning percentage and overall home ATS winning percentage. All records are from the 2000 through 2007. A team must have played at least 5 seasons of IA ball to be counted. As you would expect most of your "power" conferences dominate the home winning percentage category. Now take a look at the home ATS winning percentages. Are you surprised to see the Big East (1), WAC (2) and MAC (T4) all ranked in the top 5? What if we told you, excluding the three Independent teams, that the ACC (10) and the SEC (11) round out the bottom of the list! Scratching your head yet?

Conference Home Win % Rank Conference Home ATS % Rank
BIG 12 70 1 Big East 57.6 1
BIG 10 67.7 2 WAC 56.2 2
SEC 67.6 3 BIG 12 53.7 3
Big East 67.5 4 MAC 52.3 T4
ACC 66 5 BIG 10 52.3 T4
WAC 65.2 6 Sun Belt 51.6 6
PAC 10 63.2 7 Mountain West 50.9 7
Mountain West 60.8 8 PAC 10 50.8 8
CUSA 57.4 9 CUSA 49.8 9
Sun Belt 56.8 10 ACC 47.9 10
MAC 55.2 11 SEC 46.9 11
Independent 46.3 12 Independent 39.5 12

   Let's start our analysis with what many consider the best in college football, the SEC. These fans are hard core. Stadium capacities average over 83,000 and are almost always sold out. The noise levels are deafening and the environments are hostile. The home teams in this conference must dominate! Well, yes and no. The only teams that had a won / loss record below .500 were Mississippi St, Vanderbilt and Kentucky, no surprise there. But how about the fact there were only 4 teams in this conference with a winning ATS record at home over that span and two of them were Mississippi (+1) and Kentucky (+3).You would think if your team was going into places like Tuscaloosa AL, Knoxville TN, and Athens GA, it would be prudent to keep your money in your wallet and your wallet in your pocket. In reality, if you look at the ATS home record for those teams the odds would be in your favor! This pattern follows many of the high profile programs in the country. We list each table below according to their overall home ATS winning %.

BIG EAST HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Connecticut 24 - 13 64.9 30 - 19 61.2
South Florida 20 - 11 64.5 39 - 9 81.3
Syracuse 30 - 17 63.8 27 - 22 55.1
Cincinnati 26 - 17 60.5 33 - 14 70
Louisville 27 - 18 60 41 - 7 85.4
Rutgers 24 - 20 54.5 25 - 26 49
Pittsburgh 23 - 23 50 34 - 17 66.7
West Virginia 22 - 25 46.8 37 - 14 72.5
Overall 196 - 144 57.6 266 - 128 67.5

WAC HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Boise St 30 - 13 69.8 48 - 1 98
San Jose St 22 - 11 66.7 24 - 16 60
Nevada 28 - 15 65.1 29 - 17 63
Hawaii 32- 22 59.3 46 - 15 75.4
Louisiana Tech 19 - 15 55.9 24 - 14 63.2
New Mexico St 20 - 18 52.6 22 - 22 50
Fresno St 18 - 22 45 37 - 9 80
Utah St 15 - 19 44.1 17 - 22 43.6
Idaho 12 - 18 40 13 - 23 36.1
Overall 196 - 153 56.2 260 - 139 65.2


BIG XII HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Texas Tech 26 - 17 60.5 40 - 10 80
Oklahoma St 25 - 17 59.5 31 - 19 62
Kansas St 29 - 20 59.2 41 - 15 73.2
Texas 27 - 19 58.7 43 - 4 91.5
Missouri 25 - 19 56.8 33 - 17 66
Texas A&M 26 - 20 56.5 35 - 17 67.3
Oklahoma 26 - 24 52 49 - 2 96.1
Nebraska 27 - 25 51.9 45 - 11 80.4
Iowa St 23 - 22 51.1 32 - 20 61.5
Kansas 23 - 22 51.1 32 - 20 61.5
Colorado 22 - 24 47.8 28 - 19 59.6
Baylor 16 - 25 39 20 - 30 40
Overall 295 - 254 53.7 429 - 184 70


MAC HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Toledo 28 - 12 70 42 - 6 87.5
Ball St 20 - 14 58.8 19 - 22 46.3
Central Michigan 20 - 15 57.1 22 - 20 52.4
Ohio 20 - 16 55.6 22 - 20 52.4
Miami OH 21 - 17 55.3 26 - 13 66.7
Buffalo 21 - 18 53.8 11 - 31 26.2
Bowling Green 18 - 16 52.9 30 - 11 73.2
Northern Illinois 20 - 18 52.6 33 - 12 73.3
Temple 22 - 20 52.4 13 - 32 28.9
Eastern Michigan 15 - 17 46.9 17 - 24 41.5
Akron 17 - 20 45.9 26 - 14 65
Western Michigan 14 - 21 40 26 - 17 60.5
Kent St 12 - 22 35.3 17 - 25 40.5
Overall 248 - 226 52.3 304 - 247 55.2


SUN BELT HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Arkansas St 20 - 15 57.1 26 - 17 60.5
North Texas 21 - 16 56.8 22 - 18 55
Troy 12 - 10 54.5 32 - 6 84.2
Mid Tenn St 17 - 17 50 25 - 15 62.5
LA Monroe 13 - 15 46.4 15 - 24 38.5
LA Lafayette 13 - 17 43.3 18 - 25 41.9
Overall 96 - 90 51.6 138 - 105 56.8

MOUNTAIN WEST HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
TCU 27 - 16 62.8 39 - 6 86.7
New Mexico 23 - 19 54.8 30 - 18 62.5
Utah 24 - 20 54.5 33 - 13 71.7
BYU 24 - 22 52.2 33 - 15 68.8
Wyoming 20 - 19 51.3 22 - 23 48.9
Air Force 21 - 23 47.7 31 - 18 63.3
San Diego St 18 - 21 46.2 19 - 26 42.2
UNLV 19 - 23 45 17 - 27 38.6
Colorado St 16 - 22 42 27 - 16 62.8
Overall 192 - 185 50.9 251 - 162 60.8


PAC TEN HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Oregon St 26 - 15 63.4 38 - 11 77.6
Arizona St 30 - 19 61.2 37 - 16 69.8
UCLA 27 - 18 60 35 - 14 71.4
Oregon 26 - 22 54.2 39 - 12 76.5
Stanford 24 - 23 51.1 19 - 29 39.6
USC 25 - 24 51 41 - 8 83.7
California 21 - 25 45.7 30 - 18 62.5
Washington St 19 - 23 45.2 25 - 20 55.6
Washington 20 - 30 40 29 - 22 56.9
Arizona 17 - 29 37 20 - 32 38.5
Overall 235 - 228 50.8 313 - 182 63.2

CUSA HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Rice 24 - 14 63.2 20 - 20 50
Marshall 20 - 16 55.6 36 - 10 78.3
UCF 19 - 18 51.4 27 - 17 61.4
Tulsa 21 - 21 50 27 - 20 57.4
UAB 19 - 19 50 25 - 18 58.1
Tulane 18 - 18 50 23 - 17 57.5
Memphis 21 - 22 48.8 27 - 23 54
East Carolina 21 - 22 48.8 22 - 22 50
UTEP 19 - 20 48.7 26 - 20 56.5
SMU 21 - 25 45.7 19 - 28 40.4
So. Mississippi 17 - 21 44.8 30 - 13 69.8
Houston 19 - 25 43.2 26 - 21 55.3
Overall 239 - 241 49.8 308 - 229 57.4


ACC HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Virginia 31 - 17 64.6 38 - 12 76
Boston College 28 - 16 63.6 40 - 10 80
Virginia Tech 29 - 22 56.9 46 - 9 83.6
Maryland 24 - 21 53.3 37 - 13 74
Clemson 23 - 25 47.9 39 - 14 73.6
Georgia Tech 21 - 25 45.7 33 - 17 66
Wake Forest 19 - 23 45.2 25 - 24 51
Florida St 21 - 26 44.7 38 - 11 77.6
North Carolina 20 - 26 43.5 23 - 26 46.9
Miami Fla 20 - 29 40.8 42 - 9 82.4
NC State 16 - 30 34.8 32 - 21 60.4
Duke 14 - 29 32.6 7 - 40 14.9
Overall 266 - 289 47.9 400 - 206 66


SEC HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Florida 26 - 22 54.2  43 - 8 84.3
Auburn 28 - 24 53.8 47 - 10 82.5
Kentucky 25 - 22 53.2 25 - 28 47.2
Mississippi 24 - 23 51.1 31 - 22 58.5
LSU 26 - 26 50 49 - 7 87.5
Arkansas 26 - 27 49.1 41 - 17 70.7
Georgia 21 - 24 46.7 43 - 8 84.3
South Carolina 23 - 27 46 34 - 20 63
Tennessee 23 - 31 42.6 41 - 13 75.9
Vanderbilt 17 - 24 41.5 16 - 35 31.4
Mississippi St 17 - 28 37.8 21 - 29 42
Alabama 19 - 33 36.5 36 - 21 63.2
Overall 275 - 311 46.9 427 - 205 67.6

BIG TEN HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Iowa 32  - 16 66.7 39 - 12 76.5
Ohio St 31 - 22 58.5 48 - 7 87.3
Penn St 30 - 22 57.7 39 - 15 72.2
Purdue 26 - 21 55.3 37 - 15 71.2
Minnesota 25 - 21 54.3 32 - 19 62.7
Michigan 27 - 25 51.9 46 - 8 85.2
Wisconsin 25 - 26 49 41 - 14 74.5
Northwestern 22 - 24 47.8 26 - 22 54.2
Illinois 22 - 24 47.8 25 - 25 50
Indiana 21 - 23 47.7 24 - 25 49
Michigan St 19 - 31 38 30 - 23 56.6
Overall 275 - 311 46.9 427 - 205 67.6


iNDEPENDENTS HOME ATS  % HOME WIN / LOSS %
Notre Dame 22 - 28 44 31 - 19 62
Navy 14 - 22 38.9 21 - 22 48.8
Army 13 - 25 34.2 11 - 32 25.6
Overall 49 - 75 39.5 63 - 73 46.3
    

   It seems most teams do win more often than not at home and some teams win just about every time. But when it comes to the point spread, which in a way measures how well a team is expected to perform, the answer to our "home field advantage" question becomes less clear. What can be some of the reasons for this? Today it's common to hear coaches say they prefer to take their team on the road. Certainly there are less distractions away from home. The team stays together at a hotel and the pregame routine can be more easily controlled and regimented. Many coaches will cultivate the "us vs. the world" mentality and if a team is going into places like Tennessee , Miami or Clemson as a heavy dog it's easy to feel "disrespected". All of this can bring a team closer, make them more focused and ultimately more dangerous. Teams like Toledo, TCU, Rice and San Jose St don't exactly roll off the lips when your talking about teams that are some of the best in the country covering at home. If you look at the tables above, it does seem that the oddsmakers tend to undervalue them on their own turf.
   The discussion over home field advantage will continue from the "sports experts" on TV and radio to the water cooler at work. The intent of this article was not to provide a definitive answer. Instead, we wanted to point out that if you do believe in home field advantage maybe it doesn't exist for the teams you thought. If you don't believe in it, maybe it does exist for the teams you would least expect!

2007 NCAA football season in review...

   WOW!...We think that pretty much sums up what was the most exciting, exhilarating and unpredictable seasons in college football history. From the casual fan's point of view you couldn't ask for more. From  the Appalachian St upset of Michigan to Stanford's conquest of USC. From Colorado kicking their way past Oklahoma to South Florida rising to #2 in the nation only to lose 4 of their last 7. Illinois knocking off undefeated Ohio St, Hawaii going 12-1 and Notre Dame going 3-9.   From Pittsburgh spoiling the title hopes of West Virginia to Kansas and Kentucky shocking their conferences. Only in a season like that could a team with 2 losses in LSU win a National Title, a first in college football history!

   From a handicapper's point of view, speaking for ourselves, it was a little frustrating. Many of our picks suffered from an inordinate amount of back door covers and a high amount of turnovers. For example, of the 82 games we picked our teams finished -3 or more in the turnover margin in 11 of those. Going into those 11 games our team had a substantial turnover advantage  in 7 of them...that hurt! We failed to win or push a game by 7 points or less 9 times and failed to win or push a game by 3 points or less 12 times. The close ones certainly didn't go our way in '07. With all of that being said, we were remarkably able to finish the regular season at 41-41 and a ranking of 68 out of 107 of some of the top handicappers in the country according to The Sports Monitor of Oklahoma. The bowl season didn't fair much better. We failed to win or push by 5 points in one game and by 1 point in two games. In two other games our teams combined for 7 turnovers when they both had the turnover advantage going in. 2007 was our 7th season and it was the first time we did not produce a profit for our customers. We believe transparency is important in a sports service and we will always show our record win or lose. If a handicapping service wouldn't, I would think twice before using them. 

   In closing the 2007 season we are eager and energized for what is sure to be another thrilling season of college football in 2008. Here are some of the top story lines to keep an eye on...

  • Will Pete Carroll and the Trojans be able to stay healthy all season? If they can...look out!
  • Can Oklahoma win the Big XII again? If they do will they ever show up for the bowl game?
  • Kansas is loaded, but they go from the hunter to the hunted.
  • How long will it take Rich Rodriguez's system to catch on in Michigan?
  • Can June Jones turn around SMU?
  • Will the Irish rebound and return to the nation's elite?
  • Can anyone beat the SEC in the Championship game?